I've tried both beers I made with the grainy now, so thought I'd update my review of the machine and process of using it, to include the actual quality of the beer.
I made my boddingtons clone and a rye pale with it.
Obviously as many have pointed out, it only produces the wort, so a lot of the final beer quality is still down to yeast, fermentation control etc, but the boddingtons has been my best attempt at a bitter yet, and the rye is really nice too, though on a par with previous pales, rather than anything above and beyond. That's probably down to the fact I didn't do anything different with the rye once it went into the fv compared to my usual process/ yeast choice.
The boddingtons did use a better liquid yeast though and I think that's contributed a lot to the final product.
So to return to the grainfather, my experience has shown me it makes perfectly good wort, relatively simply, but it does leave a lot, if not most of the variables affecting outcome under your own control. So if your fermentation process is shonky, the beer could well be. But in retrospect I guess that's obvious.
So, each to their own. I can see why if you can't bear faffing with bags, tuns, HLTs, the gf is a dream machine. If like me you don't mind fannying about in the shed with grain bags, thermometers and the like, and your fermentation control is rustic to non existent, it's not by itself going to improve your beer dramatically.
Anyway, enough writing, I have a lovely rye pale to enjoy!