Irishwizard
Regular.
And that is, does anyone regularly put yeast nutrient into their wort?
and if so why?
and if so why?
Is it worth doing
- Thread starter Irishwizard
- Start date
Help Support The Homebrew Forum:
There was something on here about that very subject not too long ago. I tried it and as far as I could tell it made naff-all difference, just like using two packs of yeast did, apart from give me twice as much bloody sediment. Both those were with CML yeast, maybe others would benefit or high-gravity worts, dunno.
Crystal_Ball
Senior Member
Yes I do. I started using it when I use liquid yeast so I got the best out of it plus I couldn't be bothered to make a starter. I always make a starter now but still carry on using the nutrient as I have it. Not sure if I will replace when it has run out though.
I use it, half tsp per brew. Not sure what it does really. When the tub is empty I probably won't buy any more.
I always use a half teaspoon in each kit. My reasoning is that I use dry yeast and never rehydrate so it may help get the thing going (especially with the Muntons 5/6g sachets of yeast). Dunno if it has any effect though.
If youââ¬â¢re brewing all grain you shouldnââ¬â¢t need to use it as the wort has all the nutrients the yeast needs. I always chuck a little bit in my starters but thatââ¬â¢s the only time I use it.
Irishwizard
Regular.
Which is what I always thought, but I do like Terrys and Gunges scientific approach, so i assume the consensus is that its a waste of time. Another myth debunked, only a few hundred more to go.:mrgreen:
MyQul
Chairman of the Bored
There is a use for adding two packets of yeast. 1) Like you say, if the wort is of high gravity 2) If your making a lager you need twice as much yeast as when making an ale because of the cold 3) If your making a pseudo lager adding two packets means that the yeast make much less esters and get on with the job of fermenting striaght away, leading to a cleaner beer
Irishwizard
Regular.
Fair point. if you were fermenting at a low temp. would nutrient be beneficial? just to keep things chugging along...no science involved here lol
MyQul
Chairman of the Bored
Ajhutch
Landlord.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2016
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 1,256
I used to be on the ââ¬Ëdonââ¬â¢t botherââ¬â¢ side of this argument but Iââ¬â¢ve been frustrated recently with poor attenuation so decided to try nutrient on my latest brew. It went from 1.058 to bang on target 1.010 in about four days, much better and quicker than I had been getting. Some caveats: I no chill in my FV, so donââ¬â¢t tend to aerate as well as I probably should before pitching normally, whereas this time due to a sediment issue I racked off to another bucket and back to my FV, so my wort was much better aerated. I also used a pack of US05 that Iââ¬â¢d bought less than a week earlier rather than it sitting in my fridge for a while. So, several possible contributing factors but nutrient was one of them.
As I understand it, nutrient is principally supposedly to help with yeast growth which is why lots of people use it in starters, and also I guess explains why @gunge noticed extra sediment when using it. I guess it should reduce the lag phase on that basis, and my brew using nutrient certainly started quickly.
As I understand it, nutrient is principally supposedly to help with yeast growth which is why lots of people use it in starters, and also I guess explains why @gunge noticed extra sediment when using it. I guess it should reduce the lag phase on that basis, and my brew using nutrient certainly started quickly.
Saisonator
Landlord.
No he was going on again about the time he used two packs of dried yeast (which was probably the correct pitch rate) and got loads of sediment?
If a beer ferments from say 1.050 to 1.010, however long it takes and if you use two packs of yeast or nutrient, I can't see it making significant difference in sediment. It has an amount of wort to ferment, one way may do it quicker than the other but you have the same process producing a very similar product.
The only way you will get significantly more sediment is to cold crash and maybe add finnings.
BeerCat
Landlord.
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,292
- Reaction score
- 1,694
I use wyeast nutrient every brew now. It goes in the boil, you don't need to add during fermentation. I use RO water so i think it helps.
Irishwizard
Regular.
I have to say, Im finding this topic really interesting, with no conclusive evidence but some interesting thoughts. :thumb: ...all worthy of consideration. Well done chaps:thumb:
BeerCat
Landlord.
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,292
- Reaction score
- 1,694
I heard a podcast where the brewer only added a teaspoon of some kind of zinc. Was for a 200 barrel batch.
Irishwizard
Regular.
Thanks for the comment Mr beercat. Im going to do a sort of Elvis juice clone, only because my son likes it and and its reasonably high abv, so will chuck in some nutrient and see what happens, especially since my house is pretty cold in eire. Hardly scientific though:thumb:
BeerCat
Landlord.
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,292
- Reaction score
- 1,694
Its cold in my garage too and have fermented a few batches a little cold. I didn't bother to use temp control and i was wondering if any would stall. Happy to say all was good though. :)
I never use it but I think this article explains it quite well https://byo.com/aging/item/2043-what-are-yeast-nutrients-and-how-are-they-used
