Sewage

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Drone captures sewage pumped into sea for days Drone captures sewage pumped into sea for days

This government is turning a blind eye to water companies pumping raw sewage into rivers and the sea. No wonder they wanted Brexit so standards could be ignored.
The is the most illustrative example of "you get the country you deserve/vote for" that can be imagined...... A literal shitfest
 
Would this bunch of blaggards let their children swim on a beach near this sewage outflow.
I think if you needed it confirmed, the recent chat from Rees-Mogg about masks confirms their commitment to "Do as we say, not as we do" for the scum like ourselves.
 
Good god Lord Snooty's been let out of his towers again, he just talks sewage, time to put him in his padded cell again.
 
Would this bunch of blaggards let their children swim on a beach near this sewage outflow.

No because as stated at their own site its not designated as bathing water - (you really do need to do a little research before you rant)

WATER QUALITY
The Langstone Harbour Board takes water quality extremely seriously. Although not designated as a bathing water, the Environment Agency routinely tests the Harbour water for parameters including bacterial and heavy metal content. The Environment Agency is also responsible for investigate
 
No because as stated at their own site its not designated as bathing water - (you really do need to do a little research before you rant)

WATER QUALITY
The Langstone Harbour Board takes water quality extremely seriously. Although not designated as a bathing water, the Environment Agency routinely tests the Harbour water for parameters including bacterial and heavy metal content. The Environment Agency is also responsible for investigate
Don't defend the undefendable, do you really support the dumping of sewage, tides and currents will move it somewhere else as you well know. The article is from the BBC not me.
 
A little more searching -


hhhhhh.jpg
 
Don't defend the undefendable, do you really support the dumping of sewage, tides and currents will move it somewhere else as you well know. The article is from the BBC not me.

Your question was -
Would this bunch of blaggards let their children swim on a beach near this sewage outflow.
The answer i gave was fact its not a designated swimming area.

water companies have been dumping sewage in the seas for donkeys years instead of pointing that out as wrong you twisted it into another dig at Brexit the BBC didn't mention Brexit in the article so why bring it up try sticking to facts.
 
FFS are you telling us that pipe has only just been put there and that pumping sewage wants done pre Brexit?
Chippy, if it can't be blamed on Brexit then it can be blamed on covid - That will cover 99% of bad things happening ATM wink...

I still remember from last year 2 shops close to each other. One said cash only - due to covid. The other said card payments only due to covid.
 
Well Boris cannot be blamed for this one he never built the sewage system back in the Victorian times ;)

How often do storm overflows happen? -
They are on the increase. There were more than 400,000 raw sewage discharges last year, over 3.1 million hours – up 37% year-on-year, show figures from the Environment Agency.



Why do water companies pump sewage into the sea?

The UK’s Victorian sewer system was built with one thing in mind: removing wastewater from homes and businesses. It’s only since the Clean Water Act of 1972 that sewage has been routinely treated to remove pollutants.

Treating sewage is a slow biological process. Although water companies have storage tanks for overflow, these fill up fast during a storm. Southern Water, for instance, has a storage tank with a 40 million litre capacity (over 15 Olympic swimming pools), which fills up in about 40 minutes during a storm.

The problem comes when it rains heavily. Once storm tanks have filled up, companies have two choices: release a valve that lets the overflow into waterways or allow it to back up. In the latter case, it could (and occasionally does) back up through sewers into people’s sinks and showers.

These incidents are called storm overflows and combined sewer overflows, and are legally permitted – although they are only supposed to be used in exceptional circumstances.

In these situations, it’s worth pointing out that much of what is pumped into the sea is rainwater – although the overflows also contain effluent and waste from industry.


How often do storm overflows happen?
They are on the increase. There were more than 400,000 raw sewage discharges last year, over 3.1 million hours – up 37% year-on-year, show figures from the Environment Agency.

The rise was partly because the agency has increased the number of such incidents it monitors – in 2020, it increased the number of storm overflows it monitored by almost 50 per cent, to 12,092.

Heavy rainfall incidents are expected to rise as the climate crisis worsens, and so the number of storm overflows is likely to surge. A report published in August by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows climate change is intensifying the water cycle, creating heavier rainfall in many regions.

Did water companies really start pumping sewage into the sea after the vote?
Not really. Immediately after the MPs’ vote, a map produced by Surfers Against Sewage appeared to indicate overflows were happening in 60 locations, suggesting companies had taken it as a green light to start polluting the nation’s waters.

But as those living in coastal regions know, this isn’t new. This summer, Southern Water was fined a record £90m for illegal spills, while in August the chief executive of the Whitstable Oyster Fishery Company complained about water quality affecting his shellfish.

“If people’s perception of the water quality is that it’s not good enough to eat shellfish, that’s the end for the business,” he told the Telegraph.

What does the Environment Bill say about sewage?
The proposed amendment to the Environment Bill would have forced water companies to take “all reasonable steps” to avoid releasing untreated wastewater into rivers and seas.

Environment Secretary George Eustice recommended MPs reject the amendment: his department, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, said it was well intentioned, but it is “already delivered through the many measures within the Environment Bill and more broadly”.

Is this happening because of Brexit?
In 2018, the then-environment minister Michael Gove promised a “green Brexit”, but campaigners have suggested the Environment Bill does not bear that out. The bill, which includes rules that will allow ministers to set targets for air pollution, waste, water quality and biodiversity, has been heavily criticised, with a cross-party committee of MPs saying in 2019 that it will “severely downgrade” EU environmental rules.

But the bill isn’t the only factor at play. This week’s vote follows a decision by the Environment Agency in September to ease rules on wastewater plants discharging effluent that has not been properly treated, because problems with supply chains means they are struggling to obtain the correct chemicals. That can be more directly attributed to Brexit – although other countries are also experiencing supply chain issues because of the pandemic.

How do we solve this?
The Environment Bill goes back to the House of Lords and then returns to the Commons this week.

There are moves afoot to solve the problem: the £4.2bn Thames Tideway “supersewer” will help to prevent storm overflows from happening as frequently, although that won’t be completed until 2024.

Developers can also help by including “soakaways”, porous surfaces such as lawns and gravel areas, in their designs to absorb water during heavy rainfall, preventing it from running into the sewers. Water companies have also agreed to invest £1.1bn to improve storm overflows, a spokesperson for Water UK, the industry body, has said.

https://www.newstatesman.com/enviro...-into-the-sea-after-the-environment-bill-vote
 
Water companies have been doing this for years - under all sorts of Governments. As I understand it the current rules have been extended pending the introduction of new rules. The trendy metro types who are complaining are the same ones who have paved over their small front gardens, removing very handy soakaways and causing the massive run off which is. the heart of the problem. Classic toxic media spin.
 
Water companies have been doing this for years - under all sorts of Governments. As I understand it the current rules have been extended pending the introduction of new rules. The trendy metro types who are complaining are the same ones who have paved over their small front gardens, removing very handy soakaways and causing the massive run off which is. the heart of the problem. Classic toxic media spin.
Exactly.
 
Water companies have been doing this for years - under all sorts of Governments. As I understand it the current rules have been extended pending the introduction of new rules. The trendy metro types who are complaining are the same ones who have paved over their small front gardens, removing very handy soakaways and causing the massive run off which is. the heart of the problem. Classic toxic media spin.

clapa
 
Well I am not a trendy Metro type, and I have not paved over any of my front garden and I am complaining!
I understand any covering laid now should allow water to drain through into the ground beneath but what checks are in place non I guess.
Councils are now run on a shoestring without much motivation.
 
It was voting against the amendments that exemplifies the current trajectory of the tory party and brexshit britain.

It shouldn't come as any surprise that those good old british standards are extremely low, nor should it that they will get lower.

Chippy, you really are quite the apologist aren't you?
 
Back
Top