Grainfather mash stirring

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I've considered doing step mashes but I'm yet to find a recipe which requires it, I don't use them in my own recipes (as I'm not sure what temps and why), and when I look into it I come across a lot which says British malts are highly modified to step mashes aren't necessary. What's on paper is often different to reality, do you find any other improvements with step mashes?
My step mashes were for a wheat beer, a tripel with a lot of unmalted grains and a fair percentage of malted wheat and oats and a golden sour with a fair bit of wheat and oats. The sparging was fine in all 3, could have been the low rests or the oat husks or both.

I did a 30 min at each of 63c and 72c then the usual mash out for my last bock for no reason other than I could and to see what happened. What happened was it fermented fine, first bottle was tasty but young then the rest went ropy and still are to my knowledge. :-(

I use a fair bit of Weyermann munich and vienna and the recipes on their site suggest step mashes for most things. Continental malt may be less modified than British but probably still fine to use a single rest. I read an article on how commercial belgian beer are different because (among other things) they are step mashed for better body and head, but it still felt a bit like holding on to the romanticism of older techniques which may not be needed with modern malts and may not really give as much benefit as they are said to.
 
Regarding modern modified malts, I’ve read (Brulosophy) that the vast majority of enzymatic conversion takes place in the first 20 minutes.

I think the step mashing process may be somewhat non applicable nowadays, because of the rapid conversion.

For most of my brews, I dough in at the mash temperature. This lowers the grain bed temp 3-4C below target, and I then allow the small 500W element to bring things back up to set point on its own accord.

I guess that’s a very crude step mash in a fashion...
 
From what I have read step mashing can do more harm than good when using modified malts, for me it is a single infusion mash of 90 mins with a 90 minute boil.
 
My step mashes were for a wheat beer, a tripel with a lot of unmalted grains and a fair percentage of malted wheat and oats and a golden sour with a fair bit of wheat and oats. The sparging was fine in all 3, could have been the low rests or the oat husks or both.

I did a 30 min at each of 63c and 72c then the usual mash out for my last bock for no reason other than I could and to see what happened. What happened was it fermented fine, first bottle was tasty but young then the rest went ropy and still are to my knowledge. :-(

I use a fair bit of Weyermann munich and vienna and the recipes on their site suggest step mashes for most things. Continental malt may be less modified than British but probably still fine to use a single rest. I read an article on how commercial belgian beer are different because (among other things) they are step mashed for better body and head, but it still felt a bit like holding on to the romanticism of older techniques which may not be needed with modern malts and may not really give as much benefit as they are said to.
Ah damn, do you think that was down to the mash or was it that you can't tell because you don't wanna drink ropy beer?
 
Ah damn, do you think that was down to the mash or was it that you can't tell because you don't wanna drink ropy beer?
Here's a link if you're interested / morbidly curious - Slime!

I don't know what caused it, only other thing I did differently was pitch the slurry from a dark mild, due to time constraints I had to keep that in a sanitised jar in the fridge for a couple of days between bottling and brewing. I have actually tasted a small bit but wasn't brave enough for a full gulp, what I did taste was getting a bit sour, with lots of body...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top