Red Bull in trademark dispute with English gin firm Bullards

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Chippy_Tea

Administrator.
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
50,771
Reaction score
18,806
Location
Ulverston Cumbria.
A small gin-maker threatened with legal action by global energy drinks firm Red Bull over the use of the word 'bull' in its name says it will fight the case.
Norwich-based Bullards was told there was a "likelihood of confusion on behalf of the public" as both brand names "include the term bull".
Red Bull is opposing an application to register the mark Bullards before the UK Intellectual Property Office.
Bullards, originally founded in 1837, said the claim was "ludicrous".
In response, Red Bull told the BBC: "We do not believe it appropriate to comment on a current legal case."
In a legal letter to Bullards, Red Bull said it was "prepared to resolve this dispute" if Bullards deleted a series of goods and services from its trademark application and registration, including energy drinks, events and non-alcoholic beverages.
"Our client recognises that your client's brand stems from a historical family business and so it has asked us to highlight that it does not want to prevent your client from doing anything it has historically done," the letter said.
"What they're claiming is ludicrous," said Russell Evans of Bullards.
"There is no confusion whatsoever and actually if we did concede we would be admitting there was."

Mr Evans said Red Bull had not said his firm had to stop using the Bullards name for its gin.
"But they're saying we can't do events, we can't do soft drinks, which we are going to do because we're going to do tonics, we can't do energy drinks - not that we would ever want to do energy drinks," he said.
He added it would cost "thousands of pounds" to remove the goods and services listed in the letter and accused Red Bull of "trying to bully us".
"If needs be we'll go to court and let's see what a court of law has to say on it," he said.
Bullards was founded in 1837, making beer and importing wine and spirits, before it was taken over by national brewery Watneys in 1963.
The Bullards name was revived in 2015, with the company focusing on gin.
Austrian firm Red Bull was launched in 1987.
In 2013, Red Bull threatened the brewery Redwell Brewing in Norwich with legal action due to its name starting with 'Red' and ending with 'll', before apparently backing down, saying there was "no dispute".

1631986855115.png
 
I read this earlier and can not believe what these big bully companies are trying to do.
The y have the word bull in there name for god sake it's not even like Red Bull.
They also tried against a brewery in 2013 called Redwell brewery and said it had Red with LL on the end again nothing like Red Bull.
These companies should be boycotted as they are just unbelievable with what they are trying to do
 
Norwich-based Bullards was told there was a "likelihood of confusion on behalf of the public" as both brand names "include the term bull".

You are right its ridiculous.
 
These firms are just bullies. The best one was years ago when McDonald's took a guy named Mcdonald to court cos he had a cafe with his name above the door.
Thankfully in that case the judge told them to get stuffed clapa clapa
 
Mr Evans said Red Bull had not said his firm had to stop using the Bullards name for its gin.
"But they're saying we can't do events, we can't do soft drinks, which we are going to do because we're going to do tonics, we can't do energy drinks - not that we would ever want to do energy drinks," he said.

I hope he ignores them and they take him to court and lose.
 
Think their legal team must be training the F1 drivers on how to bully the opposition.

Back in the early 90's Microsoft tried the same on a company that created software call window. The judge threw out of court saying that there were windows in a house long before Microsoft made their operating system.
 
in the early 90's Microsoft tried the same on a company that created software call window.

If that was today i am sure the outcome would be different, calling computer software Windows is a bit cheeky but this case about having Bull on the label is ridiculous.
 
Wonder if they're doing it for free publicity...?
Accepting it's not great publicity, but definitely gets the name out there...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top