Yeast recovery advice please

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
4,217
Reaction score
4,297
Location
St Albans, Herts
Swirled up what was left in the FV after my lager (WY2308), transferred it to a sterilised flask, added about the same amount of cooled boiled water and gave it a really good shake.
But instead of stratification I've got something more like egg drop soup.

Doesn't look very promising. Advice please, e.g.:
  1. Give it more time to settle;
  2. Pour off the clear stuff and pitch the curds;
  3. Chuck it and make a starter from what's left in the bottom of the fast ferment test instead (second photo);
  4. etc...

1680959541814.png
1680960032479.png


Update: after another 30mins standing it looks like this:

1680960356602.png
 
Last edited:
Same as AA.
Thats what I do swirl decant into a sterile/sanitised jar and leave to settle out in the fridge until ready to use then pour off the beer/water
 
Agree with all of the above, but you don’t need to “give it a really good shake”. When you have decanted the beer off your brew, you add the preboiled water to the yeast cake and give it a gentle swirl to get the yeast into suspension. You don’t want to oxygenate it at this stage. Then I leave it to settle for 10 minutes, so the dead yeast and any hop debris sink to the bottom, before pouring the good stuff into a sanitised jar. Then store in the fridge until brew day.

saying all that.. I would pitch what you’ve got there into another brew within 2 or 3 weeks. It’ll be fine.
 
Wow, I am so Middle Ages on this. I just swirl the dregs from the initial FV, pour into a jug, then into some 250ml bottles (lemonade, originally) put them in the fridge, use 1 or 2 perhaps and chuck the rest when the fridge gets a bit full up with obviously stale yeast.

Strangely never had any issues.
 
It's good to remember that we're working as cleanly as possible with foodtuffs, in a kitchen environment. We're not culturing precious lifeforms in a sterile laboratory.
Personally, I pitch a new starter or rehydrated sachet and then use the yeasty trub again and perhaps a second generation. They can start tailing off after that, especially with attenuation and clearing. If I've paid good money (£7.95 or more) for a liquid yeast I'll keep some of the bottles behind to reculture the yeast from. This way a yeast can be reused for years and years without going past the second generation.
I've always had a hankering for making up a collection of frozen samples of yeast in a glycerine solution, but I've never had the time or freezer space or need to do so.
 
I very rarely go beyond 2nd generation too. For me its not just about saving money but I find it easier to pitch from a re-used yeast saved in the fridge( it does seem to start quicker) I also generally go no longer than a month if possible
 
Wassis swirl. 🧐 Sounds complex

I just tip the lees into a clean bottle after racking the beer out. Fridge or freeze. Sorted.
Simple is good :-)
Even so, I can see the benefit of 'washing' the sediment to get rid of a bit of the old trub and dead cells... and it seems quite a lot of people do it

For interest, take a look at (e.g.) Yeast Washing 101 - Brewer's Friend
 
If I've paid good money (£7.95 or more) for a liquid yeast I'll keep some of the bottles behind to reculture the yeast from. This way a yeast can be reused for years and years without going past the second generation.
Really good point @AA - I always keg my beer, but perhaps this is a good case for sticking the last 'runnings' from the FV into a bottle.

I'm idly wondering why we are happy for a "beer" in a bottle not to need keeping in the fridge - whereas we tend to keep 'sediment from the FV' (@Slid , @the baron et al) refrigerated? Have I got this confused in my head, or other than keeping the air off it (which is easily done either way) and a small amount of secondary fermentation, isn't there very little difference between the two??
 
A while ago I bought a load of PET bottle preforms (like a very thick-walled plastic test tube - as used for 'tilt' hydrometers) and I'm now thinking these would be ideal for keeping 'beer' for yeast re-culturing purposes. They are pressure tight too so they can even be primed, if that's considered to be an important part of the process.

Thoughts?
 
Really good point @AA - I always keg my beer, but perhaps this is a good case for sticking the last 'runnings' from the FV into a bottle.

I'm idly wondering why we are happy for a "beer" in a bottle not to need keeping in the fridge - whereas we tend to keep 'sediment from the FV' (@Slid , @the baron et al) refrigerated? Have I got this confused in my head, or other than keeping the air off it (which is easily done either way) and a small amount of secondary fermentation, isn't there very little difference between the two??
My logic is that if I can buy a bottle conditioned ale that's been hanging around in the supermarket for months or years and culture the yeast from it, then I can culture same from my own bottle that's been stored in the garage. I wouldn't dream of doing it with an unsealed container of tub, though. That goes in the fridge and gets used within a month or two max.
Not sure of the logic here, but will give it some thought.
I use Wyeast Scottish for my mild and I reculture it from a batch of smoked porter that is ghastly to drink (peat smoked malt not a good idea) but the bottles are still good for yeast after 2 years.
I've still got half a dozen 33s of a 7% brew I made with WLP French Ale, a Vaults yeast that I've never seen again. They must be 4 years or more old by now.
 
My logic is that if I can buy a bottle conditioned ale that's been hanging around in the supermarket for months or years and culture the yeast from it, then I can culture same from my own bottle that's been stored in the garage. I wouldn't dream of doing it with an unsealed container of tub, though. That goes in the fridge and gets used within a month or two max.
Not sure of the logic here, but will give it some thought.
I use Wyeast Scottish for my mild and I reculture it from a batch of smoked porter that is ghastly to drink (peat smoked malt not a good idea) but the bottles are still good for yeast after 2 years.
I've still got half a dozen 33s of a 7% brew I made with WLP French Ale, a Vaults yeast that I've never seen again. They must be 4 years or more old by now.
I think it might be a mistake to bottle tub or unduly cloudy beer though. If there's any viable yeast in there it ll culture up. And if it carbonated then there's yeast.
 
I think it might be a mistake to bottle tub or unduly cloudy beer though. If there's any viable yeast in there it ll culture up. And if it carbonated then there's yeast.
Not sure I follow you: surely you want viable yeast in there don't you? Sorry to be dense...

Ah - I think I see what you mean: by bottling pretty clear beer, you aim to ensure there is _only_ viable yeast in there - i.e. minimal trub etc.

I agree it seems best to avoid bottling the trub, but is there a particular reason?
 
Last edited:
Not sure I follow you: surely you want viable yeast in there don't you? Sorry to be dense...

Ah - I think I see what you mean: by bottling pretty clear beer, you aim to ensure there is _only_ viable yeast in there - i.e. minimal trub etc.

I agree it seems best to avoid bottling the trub, but is there a particular reason?
Superstition really. I don't want break proteins and early dead cells in there more than necessary. But don't really know why. I suspect it might promote autolysis. When I harvest yeast from a bought bottle, say, St Austell, I'm using the dregs from ordinary beer. Don't know if it makes a difference. It's just the, way I do it.
 
Back
Top