The downfall of the Tory party.

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
In nutshell offshore tax havens is the answer.

The EU threatened to make these accounts open to scrutiny. Now we cant have that chaps can we.!!!
 
Liz Truss has promised to get the country through "stormy days", as she set out her plans to grow the economy.
In her speech to the Tory conference, which has been marked by U-turns and internal division, the PM admitted her policies would cause "disruption".
But she insisted "the status quo is not an option", adding: "We must stay the course."
The speech came against a backdrop of financial and political turmoil following the government's mini-budget.
Markets reacted badly to the plans for £45bn in tax cuts funded by borrowing, while the government's U-turn on its plan to scrap the 45p tax band for the highest earners was fuelled by opposition from Tory MPs.

The prime minister's speech lasted around 35 minutes - shorter than is usually the case for the party leader at conference - and was briefly interrupted by fracking protesters from Greenpeace, holding up a sign reading "who voted for this".
She made no new policy announcements but pledged to stick to her promises to cut taxes and regulations on businesses.
Ms Truss acknowledged "these are stormy days", citing the global economic crisis caused by the pandemic and the war in Ukraine.
But she added: "I'm determined to get Britain moving, to get us through the tempest and to put us on a stronger footing as a nation."
The prime minister mentioned growth 29 times in her speech, recognising that her goal was "difficult but necessary".
She argued cutting taxes was "the right thing to do morally and economically" as it allowed people to keep more of their own money so they are "inspired to do more of what they do best".
However, in attempt to reassure the markets, she promised to "keep an iron grip on the nation's finances".

Highlighting her own background, Ms Truss said her upbringing in Paisley and Leeds in the 1980s and 1990s meant she knew what it was like "to live somewhere that isn't feeling the benefits of economic growth".
"I have fought to get where I am today," she told the conference, highlighting how the barriers she has faced as a woman "made me angry and it made me determined".
Echoing her predecessor Boris Johnson's pledge when he became prime minister, she promised to "level up" the country "in a Conservative way, ensuring everyone everywhere can get on".
She also vowed to take on the "anti-growth coalition" and "enemies of enterprise", including opposition parties, "militant unions" and environmental campaigners - like the ones, she said, who heckled during her speech.
The hall was not packed, but reaction during the speech was positive, and included several standing ovations.
Tory delegates leaving the conference hall echoed this, with one member saying: "She has steel and you need that when you are a woman in politics."
Cabinet ministers seated on the front row for the speech applauded as Ms Truss outlined her priorities. Afterwards Welsh Secretary Sir Robert Buckland was one who praised the leader's message, adding that her speech was "packed full of substance".
However, the liberal Conservative think tank, Bright Blue, accused Ms Truss's government of "amateurism and amorality".
Chief executive Ryan Shorthouse said her economic policies "do very little" for voters who backed the Conservatives in 2019 and "have for a long time felt forgotten".
There was a muted reaction from the financial markets, with the pound falling slightly against the dollar during Ms Truss's speech.
Government borrowing costs also fell but were slightly higher over the day.
The Tory conference has been overshadowed by divisions, after the government made a dramatic U-turn over its plans to scrap the top rate of income tax.
Some cabinet ministers and senior Conservatives have also publicly spoken out against the suggestion increases to some benefits like universal credit could be linked to wages rather than prices, which would amount to a real-terms cut.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63141831
 
Blair did handsomely, the Tory prime minister the Tories never had. Now worth 50,000,000. GBP Thanks to the T-ssers who voted for him.
All past PMs have walked away and into a round of speeches and talks making a fortune. And even the discredited Johnson has been told to expect £5m per year for the same, so considering Blair be gone 15 years he hasn't done so well.
And though there was one major (very) mistake, there were lots of very good things done during the 1997-2010 Labour governments, a lot to do with having to repair/renew necessary things that the previous governments had let rot, e.g. schools and hospitals.
And what are you going to call the voters who put Johnson in place?
 

Faisal Islam: Is Truss's growth plan running out of time?​


"Growth, growth, growth," is the metric the prime minister wants us to use to judge the effectiveness of her government. That much she made clear in her conference speech.

In forthcoming weeks we will get the economic reforms, in planning, regulation, worker visas, and elsewhere, that the PM hopes will unleash that growth.
As one minister from the John Major era, who phoned me after the speech, said, even if the strategy works perfectly, it will take time. In the mid-1990s he experienced an economic shock that affected mortgages, and that was linkable, at least in part, to government decisions. In his view "British voters do not give credit for cleaning up your own mess".
And will the strategy work, even in the long-run?
The theme of the PM's speech to conference was that she would take on the "vested interests" of the "anti-growth coalition" in order to deliver a step-change after two decades of anaemic growth.
The epitome of the problem, for her, is a 70-year high in taxation, which is why she is urgently prioritising tax cuts.
There is a tremendous amount of debate over why the UK has had sluggish growth, more or less since the financial crisis. But a 70-year high in taxation is not usually a big part of it.
For a start, it has never actually come about, because it has always been a forecast for future years (from the Office for Budget Responsibility), rather than fact, and it seems contrary to attribute decades of low growth to something that was only a prediction. Taxation over the past quarter of a century, under prime ministers Blair, Brown, Cameron, May and Johnson, has averaged 32.8% as a proportion of economic output, or GDP. Under Mrs Thatcher's 11 years that number was 32.4% of GDP.

It is clear that some lower taxes can help boost growth; all of this begs the question as to what has been weighing down the economy. Indeed it is striking the government's comprehensive and transformational policy agenda is proceeding without a thorough, published analysis of what the growth problem is, why it occurred here and not in say the USA or Germany, and therefore how it should be addressed.
That brings us back to the "anti-growth coalition". At a tense political conference, the PM was always going to focus on her external political enemies. But that coalition stretches well into her own membership in that hall.
Planning reform, for example, would help growth and productivity, but always seems to get thwarted. One interesting part of the Kwarteng growth plan refers to changing regulations to allow more onshore wind to be built. That certainly would be a statement of intent.

What other policies could increase forecast growth so quickly that they would help the current numbers add up, when the OBR does its sums? Increasing the number of foreign workers to address the visible labour shortages around the country. Are people who oppose changes to the immigration rules for political reasons part of the "anti-growth coalition"? Moves to lower new post-Brexit, non-tariff trade barriers for British exporters, could also help reverse recent reductions to the OBR's long-term growth forecast. Neither move is on the government's agenda.
Number 11 may, in general, struggle to persuade the OBR that its plans will materially change the economy. And, indeed, there is then the reverse risk in the short term: that the turbulence of the past fortnight could have a permanent effect on perceptions of the UK's macroeconomic stability.

For 20 years Britain has set the gold standard for institutional independence when it comes to economic policy, built up by successive governments. That meant low borrowing costs, even through financial, and eurozone crises, and the pandemic too. In recent weeks this administration allowed the perception to grow, that it was fiddling with these essential controls on the economy. That perception was fed by leadership campaign rhetoric, and the mini-budget's massive tax cuts, presented without hard borrowing numbers.
Whereas sterling recovered its losses over the last few days, government borrowing costs remain materially higher. Perceptions of how high the Bank of England will have to raise benchmark interest rates are also higher. Rates were always going to get back to normal - higher levels - at some point after a decade-and-a-half of ultra-low interest rates. But it didn't have to happen so violently, in a matter of days. It is rates for mortgages and company lending that have been "moving on up", to echo the PM's choice of theme tune.
The OBR is right now calculating how hard the extra interest rate shock will hit the economy, and how much it will cost the government too. And it is true to say that UK growth will also be affected by rising economic challenges elsewhere in the world, including the eurozone and the USA.
So if the PM's speech was light on policy, that might reflect the need to not do anything at this point, that could further spook markets. Above all, it seems the lesson of the last week may have sunk in: that macroeconomic stability, rooted in institutional credibility, is actually a prerequisite for "Growth, Growth, Growth".

BBC News
 

Liz Truss's speech ends showcase of dysfunction and division​

There was the content of the prime minister's speech. And then the context of its delivery.
And context is everything. This is a party that has been close to ripping itself to shreds in the last few days.
It was a conference that was a showcase of dysfunction and division, from the cabinet down. Indiscipline within government, mutiny beyond it.
Let's explore both in more detail - both what was said publicly and what I was told privately.
Firstly, there was the ruthlessly successful campaign to get a new prime minister to junk her planned tax cut for the highest earners in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Spearheaded by prominent former supporters of Liz Truss's leadership rival Rishi Sunak, yes, but with broad support including among people in government.
A crushing, humiliating, authority sapping U-turn that left the prime minister weakened and vulnerable.
Vulnerable to further mutiny, which followed within hours.

Because then came the debate about benefits - whether all such payments should go up in line with wages or the more expensive option of inflation, exposed deeper disagreement, because it exposed indiscipline within government.
The Commons leader, Penny Mordaunt, another rival of Liz Truss over the summer, said she supported a rise in line with prices, even though the government's official position was that it hadn't decided.
So much for cabinet collective responsibility. A strong prime minister would sack a cabinet minister for such insubordination.
Ms Mordaunt remains in post.
"She should be called in on Monday morning and sacked," one senior party figure who voted for Ms Truss told me.
Their face etched with anguish, they were astonished and depressed by the early weeks of her time in Downing Street.

But another senior figure, a current cabinet minister, disagreed. Ms Mordaunt is too big a figure to fire when the government is so weak, it could start of a snowballing chain of events that could bring the prime minister down, this minister speculated.
And make no mistake, fears of this government's collapse run to its highest levels.
"People need to calm the [expletive] down!," said another cabinet minister.
The only crutch that gives those at the top reprieve from their gloom is a view that another leadership race would be ridiculous and, for a party languishing so far behind in the opinion polls, an imminent election would amount to a death wish.
But there is a growing fear among some Truss supporters that there is a doom-laden fatalism among too many Conservative MPs, an assumption defeat at the next election is close to inevitable.
"They say it'd be good for us to have a stint in opposition! It drives me mad," one said.
One party veteran said the root of the worries was fundamental and depressing - a concern Ms Truss isn't in control and doesn't know what she is doing and that that is a perception that might stick.
Those around the prime minister are shaken by the turbulence of the last few days and glad this conference is over.
The speech itself was short and had no new policy ideas. A case of once bitten, twice shy, methinks.

But remember too this is a prime minister barely known by the wider electorate, still seeking to introduce herself - and it was this she sought to do in her Birmingham speech.
Character-shaping moments that give her drive, such as being handed an air hostess badge on a plane as a child, when her brothers were given pilot badges, for instance.
And a framing of her central objective, improving economic growth, by attempting to bind her political opponents together as an "anti-growth coalition." Expect to hear that phrase again.
The problems the government confronts are colossal. Economic growth, or the lack of it, is just one of many.
Gripping them would stretch a united outfit - the Conservatives are a long way from that right now.

BBC News
 
All past PMs have walked away and into a round of speeches and talks making a fortune. And even the discredited Johnson has been told to expect £5m per year for the same, so considering Blair be gone 15 years he hasn't done so well.
And though there was one major (very) mistake, there were lots of very good things done during the 1997-2010 Labour governments, a lot to do with having to repair/renew necessary things that the previous governments had let rot, e.g. schools and hospitals.
And what are you going to call the voters who put Johnson in place?
Not my quote, Tony Blair's son's reply when a reporter sarcastically asked him if he thanked his dad for buying him a 1.3 million pound house for his 18th birthday. He said I thank the t--sers who voted for him.
Blair's money has come from unearned income through his wise investments in property. I can't see Johnson earning big bucks.
 
Not my quote, Tony Blair's son's reply when a reporter sarcastically asked him if he thanked his dad for buying him a 1.3 million pound house for his 18th birthday. He said I thank the t--sers who voted for him.
Blair's money has come from unearned income through his wise investments in property. I can't see Johnson earning big bucks.
Have you a link or something to that quote?
I am having trouble finding it
 
It's 40 years since the last winter of discontent it toppled the labour government are we heading for another?
 
Keep hearing about growth, growth, growth, and to be fair, I’m not an economist. However, these past low growth years, a decade or so, have brought the lowest interest rates effecting mortgages and the like and the lowest food prices.
Like I say, I’m not an economist, but I wonder if I want growth 🤷‍♂️
 
This price cap on energy, £2500 per house. Well we now know it was a bit of a red herring.

I wonder if the next scandal will be Cap gate!
 
Not my quote, Tony Blair's son's reply when a reporter sarcastically asked him if he thanked his dad for buying him a 1.3 million pound house for his 18th birthday. He said I thank the t--sers who voted for him.
Blair's money has come from unearned income through his wise investments in property. I can't see Johnson earning big bucks.
His son has set up a very successful business. On the job training it's valued at millions, he found that a large percentage of people went to university and ended up getting jobs not related to their degree.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top